Table_4_Discrimination of 14 olive cultivars using morphological analysis and machine learning algorithms.docx

Traditional morphological analysis is a widely employed tool for the identification and discrimination of olive germplasm by using morphological markers which are monitored by subjective manual measurements that are labor intensive and time-consuming. Alternatively, an automated methodology can quantify the geometrical features of fruits, leaves and endocarps with high accuracy and efficiency in order to define their morphological characteristics. In this study, 24 characteristics for fruits, 16 for leaves and 25 for endocarps were determined and used in an automated way with basic classifiers combined with a meta-classsifier approach. This resulted to the discrimination of 14 olive cultivars utilizing data obtained from two consecutive olive growing periods. The cultivar classification algorithms were based on machine learning techniques. The 95% accuracy rate of the meta-classifier approach indicated that was an efficient tool to discriminate olive cultivars. The contribution of each morphological feature to cultivar discrimination was quantified, and the significance of each one was automatically detected in a quantitative way. The higher the contribution of each feature, the higher the significance for cultivar discrimination. The identification of most cultivars was guided by the features of both endocarps and fruits, while those of leaves were only efficient to identify the Kalamon cultivar. The combined use of morphological features of three olive organs might have an additive effect leading to higher capacity for discrimination of cultivars. The proposed methodology might be considered a phenomics tool for olive cultivar identification and discrimination in a wide range of applications including breeding.