*Skipping efficacy was always based on the ratio of skipped to native transcript observed following nested PCR analyses, and was reported either as an exact percentage ((skipped transcript)/(skipped transcript + native transcript)) or as this percentage classed into one of 2 to 4 grades (e.g. grade 1: <10%; grade 2: 10–30%; and grade 3: >30%).
收藏NIAID Data Ecosystem2026-03-08 收录
数据链接：
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Skipping_efficacy_was_always_based_on_the_ratio_of_skipped_to_native_transcript_observed_following_nested_PCR_analyses_and_was_reported_either_as_an_exact_percentage_skipped_transcript_skipped_transcript_native_transcript_or_as_this_percentage_classed_in/1358204数据链接链接失效反馈
官方服务：
资源简介：
*Skipping efficacy was always based on the ratio of skipped to native transcript observed following nested PCR analyses, and was reported either as an exact percentage ((skipped transcript)/(skipped transcript + native transcript)) or as this percentage classed into one of 2 to 4 grades (e.g. grade 1: <10%; grade 2: 10–30%; and grade 3: >30%).
创建时间：
2016-10-31
