Replication Data for: Challenging Humanitarian Intervention in the 21st century: British Domestic Actors and Horizontal Foreign Policy Contestation during the Syrian crisis Japanese Journal of Political Science

These are the qualitative data that I used for the article: Akande, Dapo and Milanovic, Marko (21 November 2015) “The constructive ambiguity of the Security Council ISIS resolution.” European Journal of International Law blog. Ambos, Kai (1999). Comment” on the articles by Bruno Simma, “Nato the UN and the Use of Force: Legal Aspects” and Antonio Cassese “Ex Iniuria Ius Oritur”, available at http://www.ejil.org/journal/Vol10/No1/coma.html. Bellamy, Alex (2006) Whither the Responsibility to Protect? Humanitarian Intervention and the 2005 World Summit. Ethics and International Affairs, 20 (2), pp. 143-169. Bevir, Mark, Daddow, Oliver, and Hall, Ian (2013) Introduction: Interpreting British Foreign Policy. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 15, pp. 163-174. Brockmeier, Sarah, et al (2016). The Impact of the Libyan Intervention Debates on Norm Protection. Global Society, 30(1), 113-133. Cantir, Cristian and Kaarbo, Juliet (eds.) (2016) Domestic Role Contestation, Foreign Policy, and International Relations, London, Routledge. Cantir, Cristian and Kaarbo, Juliet (January 2012) Contested roles and domestic politics: reflections on role theory in foreign policy analysis and IR theory. Foreign Policy Analysis 8(1), pp. 5-24. Chandler, David (2011) Libya: The End of Intervention. In The Responsibility to Protect: Challenges & Opportunities in Light of the Libyan Intervention. Bristol, E-International Relations, pp. 24-5. Checkel, Jeffrey, T. (1997) International Norms and Domestic Politics: Bridging the Rationalist-Constructivist Divide. European Journal of International Relations 3(4), pp. 473-95. Clegg, Nick et al. (29 August 2013) Why we must Act against Syria’s Chemical Weapons. Evening Standard. Daalder, Ivo and O’Hanlon, Michael (2000) Winning Ugly: NATO’s War to Save Kosovo. Washington, DC, Brookings Institution Press. Daddow, Oliver, Schnapper, Pauline (2013) Liberal Intervention in the Foreign Policy Thinking of Tony Blair and David Cameron. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 26(2), pp. 330-349. Dunne, Tim (1998) Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. London, Palgrave. Foot, Rosemary (May 2017) China and the International Human Protection Regime: Beliefs, Power, and Status in a Changing Normative Order. International Affairs (661), pp. 1-11. Gaskarth, Jamie (2014) Strategising Britain’s Role in the World. International Affairs, 90 (3), pp. 559-81. Gaskarth, Jamie (2016) Intervention, Domestic Contestation, and Britain’s National Role Conceptions. In Cantir, C. and Kaarbo, J., Domestic Role Contestation, Foreign Policy, and International Relations London, Routledge, pp. 105-121. George, Alexander and Bennett, Andrew (2005) Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MIT Press. Hagan, Joe D, et al. (2001) Foreign Policy by Coalition: Deadlock, Compromise, and Anarchy. International Studies Review, 3(2), 169-216. Glennon, J. Michael (1999). “The New Interventionism,” Foreign Affairs 78. Harnisch, Sebastian, Frank, Cornelia, and Maull, Hanns W. (2011) Role Theory in International Relations: Approaches and Analyses. London: Routledge. Hazan, Reuven (2000). Intra-party Politics and Peacemaking in Democratic Societies: Israel’s Labor Party and the Middle East Peace Process, 1992-96. Journal of Peace Research, 37(3), 363-78. Heffernan, Richard (2005). Why the Prime Minister cannot be a President: Comparing Institutional Imperatives in Britain and America. Parliamentary Affairs, 58(1), 53-70. Hehir, Aidan (2010) Humanitarian Intervention: An Introduction. London, Palgrave. Hehir, A. (2011). The Illusion of Progress: Libya and the Future of R2P. In The Responsibility to Protect: Challenges & Opportunities in Light of the Libyan Intervention. Bristol, E-International Relations, pp. 18-9. Hoekema, Jan (2004). Srebrenica, Dutchbat, and the Role of the Netherlands’ Parliament. In Hans Born, Heiner Hanggi (eds.), The Double Democratic Deficit: Parliamentary Accountability and the Use of Force under International Auspices, London: Ashgate, 73-89. Holsti, Kalevi (1970) National role conceptions in the study of foreign policy. International Studies Quarterly 14 (3), pp. 233–309. Holzgrefe J.L (2003). The Humanitarian Intervention Debate.” In Humanitarian Intervention Ethical, Legal, and Political Dilemmas, edited by J.L. Holzgrefe and Robert O. Keohane, 15-52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Houghton, David, P (1996). The Role of Analogical Reasoning in Novel Foreign-Policy Situations. British Journal of Political Science, 26(4), 523-52. Jervis, Robert (1976) Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Kaarbo, Juliet, Kenealy, Daniel (2017) Precedents, parliaments, and foreign policy: Historical Analogy in the House of Commons vote on Syria. West European Politics, pp. 62-79. Kaarbo, Juliet, Kenealy, Daniel (2015) No, Prime Minister: Explaining the House of Common’s Vote on...