Data collected from animal health stakeholders on the programme and strategy actions that prevent and control Rift Valley fever's risk

Thirty nine actions have been grouped into six catergories: 1) input agricultural production, 2) food safety and handling industries, 3) food supply chains, infrastructure, distribution and storage, 4) food waste and disposal, 5) governance and partnerships, 6) research, education and skills development. Each of the 28 participants in animal health professions have indicated the actions that they deem as most and least priority between a provided subset of programme and strategy actions under the six catergories. Sheet 1, in the excel file provides the aggregated most and least 2-4 actions ranked under each category. Therefore the highest priority and lowest priority actions are selected to indicate which actions stakeholders deem for policy-making (programmes and strategies) relevance or non-relevance. These results are further analysed with another group of stakeholders to validate their relevance to food-centered programme and strategy planning.

将三十九项行动划分为六个类别：1）输入农业生产，2）食品安全与处理行业，3）食品供应链、基础设施、分配与储存，4）食品浪费与处理，5）治理与合作伙伴关系，6）研究与技能发展。每位参与的动物健康专业人员（共28位）均已指出，在六个类别下提供的程序和策略行动子集内，他们认为最优先和最不优先的行动。Excel文件中的第一页提供了每个类别下被综合排序的最优先和最不优先的2至4项行动。因此，选取最高优先级和最低优先级的行动，以表明利益相关者认为这些行动对于政策制定（程序和策略）的相关性或非相关性。这些结果随后与另一组利益相关者进行分析，以验证其对于以食品为中心的程序和策略规划的相关性。