Osteolitic vs Osteoblastic metastatic lesion: Computational modeling of fracture risk in the human vertebra after screws fixation procedure

Metastatic lesions compromise the mechanical integrity of vertebrae, increasing the fracture risk. Screwfixation is usually performed to guarantee spinal stability and prevent dramatic fracture events. Accordingly, predicting the overall mechanical response in such conditions is critical to planning and optimizing the surgical treatment. This work proposes an image-basedfinite element computational approach describing the mechanical behavior of a patient-specific instrumented metastatic vertebra by assessing the effect of lesion size, location, type and shape on the fracture load and fracture patterns under physiological loading conditions. A specific constitutive model for the metastasis is integrated to account for the effect of the diseased tissue on the bone material properties. Computational results demonstrate that size, location, and type of metastasis significantly affect the overall vertebral mechanical response, and suggest better account these parameters in estimating the fracture risk. Combining multiple osteolytic lesions to account for irregular shape of the overall metastatic tissue has a not significant effect on fracture load of vertebra macroscopically. In addition, the combination of loading mode and metastasis type is shown for the first time as a critical modeling parameter in determining the fracture risk. The proposed computational approach moves towards defining a clinically integrated tool to improve the management of metastatic vertebrae and quantitatively evaluate fracture risk.