Data for: A multi-stage process to develop quality indicators

This dataset contains the responses from 21 individuals who took part in a modified Delphi panel, based on the RAND/UCLA method. Each panel member evaluated a set of quality indicators (QIs) for community-based palliative care (PC). Each of the 27 QIs was evaluated across 4 criteria: 1) Importance - the extent to which the indicator reflects an important outcome or issue for those receiving PC or their caregivers; 2) Validity - the degree to which the indicator truly captures some aspect of the quality of care (at a population level, not for an individual); 3) Evidence of improved outcomes - evidence that improvement in the indicator can have a positive effect on the individual; 4) Usability - the extent to which the QI can be readily interpreted and used to improve care delivery. Each criterion was scored on a scale from 1 (low) to high (9). Panel members also provided written comments to support their scoring across each criterion, comments about the definition of the QI and any other comments they wished to share.