Supplemental Material Table S1-S9

Table S1. Genome details of Sulfurospirillum genomes utilized in this study. All information was compiled and retrieved from the RefSeq database and NCBI. Table S2. Genome-wide pairwise comparisons for the delineation of Sulfurospirillum species. The distances (e.g., digital DDH estimates and confidence intervals) between each pair of Sulfurospirillum strains were calculated by three different formula d0, d4, and d6. Formulae d0 and d6 measure the similarity in gene content, the formula d4 reports a similarity based on sequence identity. Table S3. ANIm values calculated for each pair of Sulfurospirillum strains by Jspecies. Table S4. ANIb values calculated for each pair of Sulfurospirillum strains by Jspecies. Table S5. Functioning-based comparison of metabolic reconstruction for strains ACSTCE (A) and ACSDCE (B) by RAST. Table S6. Sequence-based comparison of metabolic reconstruction for strains ACSTCE and ACSDCE by RAST using the coding sequences of strain ACSTCE as a reference. Table S7. Sequence-based comparison of metabolic reconstruction for strains ACSTCE and ACSDCE by RAST using the coding sequences of strain ACSDCE as a reference. Table S8. Annotation of the strain ACSTCE plasmid sequence using the eggNOG-mapper. Table S9. Annotation of the strain ACSDCE plasmid sequence using the eggNOG-mapper.