Comparison of the performance of four analytical methods (ABGD, BIN, GMYC, TCS) ranked by the number of MATCHES.
收藏Figshare2015-12-03 更新2026-04-29 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Comparison_of_the_performance_of_four_analytical_methods_ABGD_BIN_GMYC_TCS_ranked_by_the_number_of_MATCHES_/1368904
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
BIN has a single OTU estimate for each dataset, while GMYC has 6 and TCS has 10. There are 36 outcomes for ABGD for the Gelechiinae (JC and K2P are combined as the results were identical) and 32 for the Elachistinae. Description of parameters and MATCH, SPLIT, MERGE and MIXTURE categories are provided in the Material and Methods.BEAST: Bayesian gene tree reconstructed in BEAST, Yule: Yule tree prior, Coalescent: coalescent tree prior, Single: single threshold model, Multiple: multiple threshold model, JC: Jukes-Cantor substitution model, K2P: Kimura two parameter substitution model, X: relative gap width, P: prior intraspecific divergence value,*: initial partition.Comparison of the performance of four analytical methods (ABGD, BIN, GMYC, TCS) ranked by the number of MATCHES.
创建时间:
2015-12-03



