five

Determinants of intellectual property rights protection in Asian developing countries

收藏
DataCite Commons2025-04-01 更新2025-04-16 收录
下载链接:
https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/ww4pz2mb5t
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
This data set provides data on intellectual property rights protection (IPRs), economic growth (GDPCAP), trade openness (TRADE), education (EDU), participation in World Trade Organization (WTO), and economic freedom (EF) of 25 Asian developing countries over eleven years from 2006 to 2016. Of the six variables, data for the independent variable IPRs is calculated by the authors. Based on the GP Index designed by Ginarte and Park (1997) and updated by Park (2008), the authors review all patent laws, acts, and amendments of 25 Asian developing countries from 2006 to 2016 to assess and quantify the protection level of each country. Other variables including GDPCAP, TRADE, EDU, WTO, and EF are extracted from published reports and data of World Bank, WTO, and Fraser Institute. The sample of countries is based on the list of developing countries declared by Australian Department for Foreign Affairs and Trade (2018). The authors exclude Myanmar, Maldives, Timor-Leste, Palestine, and Iran because they do not provide an official national patent system. We also exclude Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and Afghanistan due to unavailable information. The average score of IPRs of developing countries in Asia for the year 2006-2016 is 3.393 out of 5. Overall, pharmaceuticals and plant and animal variables are most often deemed unpatentable. The countries often lack enforcement provisions, especially regarding contributory infringement. Syrian Arab Republic performs the lowest level of IPRs protection, scoring 2.358 while the highest value is recorded to be 4.542 in China. The regression analysis reveals determinants of IPRs protection in 25 Asian developing countries. Economic growth, trade openness, and WTO participation are significant positive determinants. Interestingly, education is found out to have negative impacts on levels of IPRs protection. Economic freedom is not a determinant of IPRs protection. This set of data can be useful for empirical studies that attempt to discover the interfaces between intellectual property rights protection and various subject matters in the economy such as Foreign Direct Investment, firm performance, etc. with an emphasis placed on Asian developing countries or a sub-group of it.
提供机构:
Mendeley
创建时间:
2021-07-12
5,000+
优质数据集
54 个
任务类型
进入经典数据集
二维码
社区交流群

面向社区/商业的数据集话题

二维码
科研交流群

面向高校/科研机构的开源数据集话题

数据驱动未来

携手共赢发展

商业合作