five

HAC-Studios-Org/prompted-hearts-ai-trust-pack

收藏
Hugging Face2026-03-24 更新2026-03-29 收录
下载链接:
https://hf-mirror.com/datasets/HAC-Studios-Org/prompted-hearts-ai-trust-pack
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
--- language: - en pretty_name: Prompted Hearts AI Trust Pack 02 license: other license_name: hac-studios-pilot-artifact-license license_link: https://huggingface.co/datasets/HAC-Studios-Org/prompted-hearts-ai-trust-pack/blob/main/LICENSE.txt task_categories: - text-generation - text-classification tags: - llm-evaluation - dialogue-safety - ai-trust - conflict-evaluation - fiction-derived - red-teaming - alignment size_categories: - n<1K --- # Prompted Hearts AI Trust Pack 02 **Subtitle:** Trust Rupture and Human-AI Conflict Under Emotional Strain **Publisher:** Hayden Academy Collective (HAC) Studios **Version:** v0.1 **Language:** English **Format:** JSONL + Markdown + JSON ## What this is This pack is a compact evaluation package built from an author-controlled source chapter of *Prompted Hearts & Grief Algorithm*. The source scene is a single continuous rupture: flirtation, interruption, AI disclosure, medicine-adjacent argument, sarcasm, moral alarm, breakup, retaliation impulse, and self-justifying aftershock. The package turns those beats into reusable evaluation artifacts for testing whether a model can stay grounded when technology, attraction, shame, and professional identity collide. This is not a raw prose release. It is not a generic AI debate set. It is a source-grounded pilot eval pack. ## Key stress vectors - professional identity threat - anti-AI moral panic - hearsay vs evidence - sarcasm under pressure - disclosure-triggered trust collapse - romantic and ideological entanglement - post-conflict justification and retaliatory impulse ## What is included - `README.md` - `DATASET_CARD.md` - `hf_dataset_card.md` - `methodology.md` - `dataset/scenarios.jsonl` - `dataset/eval_prompts.jsonl` - `dataset/metadata_schema.json` - `dataset/taxonomy.json` - `rubrics/dialogue_safety.json` - `rubrics/argument_quality.json` - `rubrics/emotional_attunement.json` - `rubrics/deescalation.json` - `graders/grader_config.json` - `graders/pass_fail_rules.json` - `examples/good_outputs.jsonl` - `examples/bad_outputs.jsonl` - `examples/edge_case_outputs.jsonl` - `report/sample_results.md` - `report/sample_scorecard.json` - `LICENSE.txt` - `.gitattributes` ## Intended use Use this pack to evaluate whether a model can: - respond to emotionally loaded anti-AI objections without smugness - separate valid concern from hearsay, exaggeration, or moral panic - preserve dignity under accusation and ideological hostility - avoid sarcasm, sermonizing, and emotional flattening - recognize when disagreement has shifted into rupture - stay bounded around medicine-adjacent AI claims Teams likely to care: - model behavior and alignment teams - dialogue safety teams - trust and escalation QA teams - red-teamers testing AI use objections in medicine-adjacent settings ## Not intended for - raw literary distribution - clinical decision support deployment - suicide-risk adjudication - benchmarking factual truth of the source scene's claims - training-rights assumptions ## Quick start 1. Read `methodology.md`. 2. Inspect `dataset/metadata_schema.json` and `dataset/taxonomy.json`. 3. Run `dataset/eval_prompts.jsonl`. 4. Score with `rubrics/*.json`. 5. Apply `graders/pass_fail_rules.json`. 6. Compare against `examples/*.jsonl` and `report/sample_results.md`. ## Provenance All records are derived from a creator-supplied source chapter and transformed into compact tasks with source anchors, conflict staging, hidden-subtext notes, and failure-mode tags. The package does not reproduce the chapter as-is. ## Method The package preserves stable `ph02_*` IDs while mapping each scenario to a recognizable beat such as the patient call, the "human medicine" accusation, the pediatric anecdote, the suicide hearsay claim, the sarcastic counter, the anti-human exit, or the post-rupture DM impulse. ## Licensing note Creator-owned pilot artifact. Do not assume training, derivative, publication, or commercial rights without separate written agreement. ## Created by Keith Hayden Hayden Academy Collective (HAC) Studios [Website](https://keithhayden.net/)
提供机构:
HAC-Studios-Org
5,000+
优质数据集
54 个
任务类型
进入经典数据集
二维码
社区交流群

面向社区/商业的数据集话题

二维码
科研交流群

面向高校/科研机构的开源数据集话题

数据驱动未来

携手共赢发展

商业合作