Sharpe_PreySizeCompetition.csv

There are many benefits of group living, but also substantial costs, one of which is competition for resources. How scarce food resources are distributed among different members of a population or social group—whether via scramble or contest competition— can influence not only the variance in individual fitness, but also the stability and therefore survival of the group or population. 2. Attributes of the food resources themselves, such as their size, may also influence the type of intraspecific competition that occurs, and therefore the intrinsic stability of a group or population. 3. By experimentally manipulating the size of prey fed to artificial colonies of the social spider <i>Anelosimus eximius, </i>we investigated whether prey size could alter the degree of scramble vs. contest competition that takes place and, thus, potentially, influence colony population dynamics. 4. We found that large prey were shared more evenly than small prey, and that individuals in poor condition were more likely to feed when prey were large than when prey were small. Additionally we show that individuals participating in prey capture are also more likely to feed on the captured prey. 5. We developed a simple mathematical model to explore the prey sizes that would be energetically worth defending, i.e. “economically defendable”. The model shows that neither very small, nor prey above a certain size is worth monopolizing 6. As the size of prey captured by social spider colonies increases with colony size, our findings suggest that scramble competition may predominate in large colonies. Scramble competition, combined with the fact that prey biomass per capita declines as colonies grow beyond a certain size, would then explain why extremely large colonies of this social spider may suddenly go extinct. Our project thus illustrates the potential triple link between characteristics of the resources, individual behaviour, and population dynamics, a link rarely considered in an empirical setting.