five

Code and data for "A Systematic Map of Methods for Assessing Societal Benefits of Earth Science Information"

收藏
National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis Data Repository2026-01-02 更新2026-05-02 收录
下载链接:
https://data.nceas.ucsb.edu/view/doi%3A10.5063%2FF1MP51R3
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
Dataset includes code for cleaning and analyzing citations from Web of Science, Scopus, and the USGS Societal Benefits Library. Results of screening at various stages are included. Files include a .zip file of the Github repository at the time of submission, as well as individual files of screening results (title/abstract screening results from Colandr, and full text screening results including coding notes). Manuscript abstract: Remotely sensed Earth science information (ESI) has become increasingly central to addressing global challenges, yet its societal value, i.e., the difference ESI makes in real-world decisions and outcomes, is rarely quantified. In this study, we systematically map peer-reviewed literature that explicitly assesses the societal value of ESI across instrumental, intrinsic, and relational value types, and the diversity of approaches used to assess those values. Drawing from 13,823 publications across Scopus, Web of Science, and a curated library of ESI valuation studies, we identify 171 studies that applied ESI in a decision context and used a valuation method to compare outcomes with and without ESI. The majority of these studies employed decision analysis methods (e.g., Value of Information, Cost-Benefit Analysis), focusing primarily on quantitative instrumental values (e.g., profit, crop yield, lives saved), particularly in agricultural contexts. A smaller set of studies applied preference elicitation methods (e.g., stated preference, surveys, interviews, focus groups) to capture qualitative benefits and relational values including quality of life improvements, empowerment, and procedural justice. Many excluded studies demonstrated scientific value of ESI but did not explicitly translate that into societal value, revealing the need for a more systematic approach to ESI valuation. By promoting a more inclusive, interdisciplinary, and flexible portfolio of valuation methods, we aim to expand our understanding of the societal benefits of ESI to help guide investment in future missions, enhance public support, and ensure that science and policy goals are well aligned.
提供机构:
["Casey O'Hara"]
创建时间:
2025-12-02
5,000+
优质数据集
54 个
任务类型
进入经典数据集
二维码
社区交流群

面向社区/商业的数据集话题

二维码
科研交流群

面向高校/科研机构的开源数据集话题

数据驱动未来

携手共赢发展

商业合作