five

spectralbranding/r15-synthetic-cohorts

收藏
Hugging Face2026-04-17 更新2026-04-26 收录
下载链接:
https://hf-mirror.com/datasets/spectralbranding/r15-synthetic-cohorts
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
--- license: cc-by-nc-nd-4.0 task_categories: - text-generation tags: - doi:10.57967/hf/8441 - brand-perception - synthetic-cohorts - llm-evaluation - spectral-brand-theory - prism-b - primacy-effect pretty_name: R15 Synthetic Cohort Differentiation size_categories: - 1K<n<10K configs: - config_name: run15_main data_files: - split: train path: data/run15_synthetic_cohorts.jsonl - config_name: run15b_robustness data_files: - split: train path: data/run15b_robustness_latin_square.jsonl --- # R15 Synthetic Cohort Differentiation Synthetic cohort differentiation experiment (Run 15 + Run 15b Latin-square robustness) from the Spectral Brand Theory research program. ## Dataset Description - **Paper**: [Dimensional Collapse in AI-Mediated Brand Perception: Large Language Models as Metameric Observers (Zharnikov, 2026v)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19422427) - **Repository**: [sbt-papers/r15-ai-search-metamerism](https://github.com/spectralbranding/sbt-papers/tree/main/r15-ai-search-metamerism) - **Point of Contact**: dmitry@spectralbranding.com ## Dataset Summary 1,200 API calls (800 main + 400 robustness) testing whether the PRISM-B instrument differentiates synthetic observer cohorts defined by behavioral vignettes (no SBT dimension vocabulary in prompts). - **Run 15 (main)**: 10 cohorts x 5 brands x 5 models x 3 repetitions = 800 calls - **Run 15b (robustness)**: 8x8 Latin-square balanced dimension ordering x 10 cohorts x 5 brands x 1 model = 400 calls ### Key Findings - **H1 SUPPORTED**: Cohorts produce significantly different spectral profiles (ANOVA p < .001 on 7/8 dimensions) - **H2 SUPPORTED**: Trait-profile similarity predicts spectral-profile similarity (Mantel r = .43, p < .001) - **H3 SUPPORTED**: Dimension-specific sensitivity confirmed (Economic eta-sq = .394, Ideological = .264) - **Primacy effect discovered**: Serial position bias in JSON elicitation (eta-sq = .217). First-listed dimension gets ~15.4%, last gets ~8.0%. Cohort effects dominate on 5/8 dimensions. ### Models Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-4o-mini, Gemini 2.5 Flash, DeepSeek V3, Grok 4.1 Fast (xAI). ### Brands Hermes, IKEA, Patagonia, Erewhon, Tesla (canonical SBT profiles). ## Data Files - `data/run15_synthetic_cohorts.jsonl` — 800 records, main experiment - `data/run15b_robustness_latin_square.jsonl` — 400 records, Latin-square robustness - `prompts/` — cohort profiles, brand profiles, experiment configuration - `protocol/` — pre-registered hypotheses and design - `analysis/` — results JSON and human-readable summaries ## Citation ```bibtex @article{zharnikov2026v, author = {Zharnikov, Dmitry}, title = {Dimensional Collapse in AI-Mediated Brand Perception: Large Language Models as Metameric Observers}, year = {2026}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.19422427} } ```
提供机构:
spectralbranding
5,000+
优质数据集
54 个
任务类型
进入经典数据集
二维码
社区交流群

面向社区/商业的数据集话题

二维码
科研交流群

面向高校/科研机构的开源数据集话题

数据驱动未来

携手共赢发展

商业合作