five

eli5

收藏
魔搭社区2025-12-04 更新2025-01-11 收录
下载链接:
https://modelscope.cn/datasets/sentence-transformers/eli5
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
# Dataset Card for ELI5 This dataset is a collection of question-answer pairs, collected from the Explain Like I'm 5 subreddit. See [ELI5](https://huggingface.co/datasets/eli5) for additional information. This dataset can be used directly with Sentence Transformers to train embedding models. ## Dataset Subsets ### `pair` subset * Columns: "question", "answer" * Column types: `str`, `str` * Examples: ```python { 'question': 'Why chemical weapons considered more indiscriminate than conventional weapons?', 'answer': "Well, any large-scale ordinance is indiscriminate. The problem particularly with Chemical weapons is that, especially with those that are gas based, is that the actual range of the weapon is much larger than the blast radius. The Chemical residue can remain in the area for a long period of time, it can taint and damage water and food supplies, it can be carried on clothing, such that you could drop it on a house full of terrorists, but if there is an orphanage upwind, they are going to get some of it as well. With conventional ordinance, you can target and turn that building full of terrorists into rubble, and thanks to years of testing, we know more or less a good idea of the collateral damage. With a chemical warhead, its not one building - its anything and everything in that area. There is nothing pinpoint about a chemical weapon system - it can and will spread beyond the impact zone That is what makes it (imho) more 'indescriminate' than conventional weaponry.", } ``` * Collection strategy: Reading the ELI5 dataset from [embedding-training-data](https://huggingface.co/datasets/sentence-transformers/embedding-training-data). * Deduplified: No

# ELI5 数据集卡片 本数据集为从`Explain Like I'm 5`子版块收集的问答对集合,更多相关信息可查阅[ELI5](https://huggingface.co/datasets/eli5)。该数据集可直接配合Sentence Transformer(句子Transformer)模型开展嵌入模型的训练。 ## 数据集子集 ### `pair` 子集 * 列名:"question"(问题)、"answer"(回答) * 列类型:均为字符串(str) * 示例: python { 'question': '为何化学武器被认为比常规武器更具无差别杀伤性?', 'answer': "实际上,任何大规模军械均存在无差别杀伤的问题。而化学武器的特殊隐患在于,尤其是气态化学武器,其实际作用范围远大于爆炸冲击波半径。化学残留物可长期滞留于受污染区域,污染并破坏水源与食物供应,还可附着于衣物上扩散。例如,即便仅向藏匿恐怖分子的建筑投放化学武器,若上风处存在孤儿院,其中的人员也会受到波及。而使用常规军械时,可精准锁定目标建筑并将其夷为平地,且经过多年测试,我们已能较为准确地预估附带损伤范围。但化学弹头的影响绝非局限于单栋建筑,而是覆盖该区域内的所有物体与人员。化学武器系统不具备精准打击能力——其扩散范围必将超出打击区域。在我看来,这正是化学武器比常规武器更‘无差别’的原因所在。", } * 数据收集策略:从[embedding-training-data](https://huggingface.co/datasets/sentence-transformers/embedding-training-data)中读取ELI5数据集。 * 去重情况:未进行去重。
提供机构:
maas
创建时间:
2025-01-06
5,000+
优质数据集
54 个
任务类型
进入经典数据集
二维码
社区交流群

面向社区/商业的数据集话题

二维码
科研交流群

面向高校/科研机构的开源数据集话题

数据驱动未来

携手共赢发展

商业合作