Table 1 in Revised taxonomy of eastern North Pacific killer whales (Orcinus orca): Bigg's and resident ecotypes deserve species status

Table 1. Measures of differentiation, divergence and diagnosability based on nuclear microsatellite and SNP data. All frequency-based metrics (FST, F’ST, G’ST) were significantly different from zero at p <0.05.
divergence metricreferencedA (CR)0.007 46a[114]dA (mitogenome)0.003 91b[114]FST (microsatellite)0.21–0.23[56,85]F’ST (microsatellite)0.47[56]G’ST (microsatellite)0.28[56]FST (SNP)0.28[15]F(RADseq, neutral)c ST0.27[58]F(RADseq, selected)c ST0.67[58]FST (genomes)0.32[9] (electronic supplementary material, table S2)diagnosability (CR)100%[114]diagnosability (mitogenome)100%[114]fixed differences (mitogenome)57[7]fixed differences (3281 nuclear SNPs)2–7[58]fixed differences (6 435 100 nuclear SNPs)6361d[113]
a 95% confidence interval:0.00727–0.00772. b 95% confidence interval: 0.00388–0.00393. c Alaska transients (Bigg’s) versus Alaska residents. d Based on analysis of raw SNP data from Kardos et al. [113].