Data for: Pastoralist decision-making on the Tibetan plateau
收藏DataCite Commons2025-05-17 更新2024-07-13 收录
下载链接:
https://data.qdr.syr.edu/citation?persistentId=doi:10.5064/F6WACFVR
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
<b>This is an <a href="https://qdr.syr.edu/ati">Annotation for Transparent Inquiry (ATI)</a> data project. </b> <h3>The annotated article can be viewed on the <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10745-017-9891-8#annotations:group:2Nopp9mx" >publisher's website</a>. <h3/>
<em>You will need to use the Chrome browser with the <a href="https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/hypothesis-web-pdf-annota/bjfhmglciegochdpefhhlphglcehbmek" target="_blank">Hypothesis extension</a> installed to view the ATI annotations</em>
</br>
</br>
<h3> Data Generation & Analysis </h3>
<p>This article is one of six resulting from an interdisciplinary, collaborative NSF-funded project that sought to investigate the multiple (social and ecological) correlates of rangeland status on the Tibetan Plateau. The project was motivated by the fact that rigorous studies of putative causes of rangeland degradation on the Tibetan Plateau have been lacking, and as a result, policies are being implemented without clear rationale or evidence. These same policies are often both ecologically ineffective and socially and culturally detrimental to Tibetan communities. The project combined repeated vegetation sampling on fixed plots, an exclosure experiment, and GPS tracking of livestock with intensive interviews with herders. While several of the articles resulting from the study are very interdisciplinary in nature, this article is primarily an interpretive article based on qualitative data, though some of the arguments are made in relation to the results of the vegetation studies.</p>
<p>More specifically, this article identifies three major assumptions of the Chinese state’s grassland policies, and uses qualitative evidence to refute each one.</p>
提供机构:
Qualitative Data Repository
创建时间:
2019-11-01



