five

Matching Method to Mind: Personality-Decision Style Profiles and Differential Responsiveness to Defocusing Interventions

收藏
DataCite Commons2025-11-17 更新2026-04-25 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Matching_Method_to_Mind_Personality-Decision_Style_Profiles_and_Differential_Responsiveness_to_Defocusing_Interventions/30634262/2
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
This dataset contains experimental data from a study examining how defocusing interventions reduce the focusing illusion—a cognitive bias where individuals disproportionately emphasize salient negative events (e.g., social blunders) when predicting social repercussions, contributing to social anxiety. You may open the .omv file in Jamovi (open source software). The first author being a student and less proficiency in programming, preferred to use Jamovi over RStudio (Author 2 used this to confirm the analysis).<br><br><b>Study Overview</b><br>Ninety-seven college students (ages 18-25) participated in a randomized between-subjects experimental design. Participants evaluated eight social blunder scenarios, rating anticipated embarrassment, shame, perceived social costs, and fear of negative judgment under control or defocusing intervention conditions.<br><br><b>Key Findings</b><br>Defocusing interventions significantly reduced perceived negative social costs (p = .010, d = 0.54) and negative judgment expectations (p = .004, d = 0.61). Cluster analysis identified three personality-decision style profiles with<br>differential intervention responsiveness. Analysts (high conscientiousness) showed largest benefits for concrete social cost reduction (d = 0.85); Explorers (high openness/extraversion) for reducing judgment-related anxiety (d = 0.96). Agreeableness moderated effects across profiles.<br><br><b>Dataset Contents</b><br>Sample size: N = 97<br>Study design: Between-subjects experimental design<br>Age range: 18-25 years<br>Population: College students<br>Country: India<br>IRB approval: Yes<br>Data de-identification: Complete<br>Open data: YesGroup 1= Control, 2=ExperimentalBig Five personality traits and decision-making styles, social anxiety symptoms (SPIN), outcome measures, clustering analysis results (K-means and Latent Profile Analysis validation), and descriptive statistics by<br>condition and profile.<br>More questions about this research may be directed to Dr Koteshwar Ramesh Rakesh, Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Delhi-NCR campus, Ghaziabad – 201003, Uttar Pradesh, India. email: rakeshkr288@gmail.com.
提供机构:
figshare
创建时间:
2025-11-17
5,000+
优质数据集
54 个
任务类型
进入经典数据集
二维码
社区交流群

面向社区/商业的数据集话题

二维码
科研交流群

面向高校/科研机构的开源数据集话题

数据驱动未来

携手共赢发展

商业合作