A Replication Package for Contentious Patch Analysis

[SUMMARY]To enable future studies, we have made a replication package available here, which includes the quantitative and qualitative data, and more detailed hierarchies of the reasons for abandonment and integration of contentious patches (omitted in the paper due to space limitations).<br>[DATASET]- <i>RQ1_RQ3.zip</i> consists of the raw datasets and R script that replicate the graphs in our quantitative analysis.- <i>RQ4_RQ5.zip</i> consists of the two labeled datasets where each review is labeled as spsn, snsp, or non (Non-Contention).<br><br>[CONTENTION CATEGORY (RQ4 and RQ5)]<i>Contention_NonContention_Comparison.pdf</i> consists of two taxonomies that explain the detailed reviewer concerns.- Table 1 shows the taxonomy that explains the reviewer concerns that raise contention in abandoned SP-SN and SN-SP reviews. In addition to it, this table also does reviewer concerns that were raised without contention in abandoned non-contentious reviews.- Table 2 shows the taxonomy that explains how reviewers resolve contention in integrated SP-SN and SN-SP reviews. In addition to it, this table also does reviewer concerns that were raised without contention in integrated non-contentious reviews.<br>