All raw data.

Objectives
Periodontal probing and intraoral radiography are conventional methods for periodontal assessment. Evaluating periodontium using CBCT-reconstructed multiplanar or cross-sectional views is labor-intensive and time-consuming. The objective of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of CBCT-simulated panoramic projections for periodontal assessment and determine whether a more efficient evaluation method can be developed.
Methods
CBCTs taken at East Carolina University School of Dental Medicine from 2014–2023 were screened. The inclusion criteria were: (1) diagnostic-quality CBCT scans covering maxilla and/or mandible; (2) full-mouth surveys (FMXs) taken within 6 months of the CBCT scans; and (3) clinical attachment loss (CAL) noted in periodontal charting. The cementoenamel junction (CEJ) to alveolar crest distance on mesial and distal surfaces of maxillary and mandibular central incisors, canines, first premolars, and first molars were measured on bitewings/periapical radiographs (BW/PA) and CBCT-simulated panoramic images. CALs were extracted from periodontal chartings. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc test, Pearson correlation, and Bland Altman analysis were used to analyze the data.
Results
CBCT, BW/PA, and CAL demonstrated strong correlations, with BW/PA and CBCT producing comparable results in periodontal assessments for most sites. For mandibular central incisors and canines, CBCT and PA showed significantly more bone loss compared to CAL values. For the mandibular molars, CBCT revealed significantly more bone loss compared to BW.
Conclusions
CBCT-reconstructed panoramic imaging has proven to be a reliable tool for periodontal assessment. Some discrepancies among the evaluation methods are likely due to periodontal configurations or conditions, operator errors, and the projection geometry of intraoral radiographs.