five

Research data supporting "Avoidant Coping Style to High Imminence Threat Is Linked to Higher Anxiety-Like Behavior"

收藏
www.repository.cam.ac.uk2025-01-21 收录
下载链接:
https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/items/e1fa5e25-5437-4d0e-884a-44eedf99edc5
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
Data of the behavioural scores for all animals on the human intruder test and model snake test in this study. The animal's behaviour was scored after the test from video recordings. Vocalizations were visualized in the form of sonograms for scoring. The excel file contains three sheets. The first sheet, 'Figure 1' contains all the data used to construct figure 1 of the article. The sex and behavioural scores for animals scored on the human intruder test are stated here. The anxiety-like behaviour factor score derived from the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is also included. The second sheet, 'Figure 2' contains all the data used to construct figure 2 of the article. The sex, behavioural scores and corresponding EFA-derived factor scores for coping on the model snake test are stated here. The final sheet, 'Figure 3' contains the data for figure 3 of the article. The EFA-derived factor scores for animals tested on both human intruder and model snake test are stated here. The coping style group of each animal was determined based on the median active and avoidant coping factor scores from the model snake test. Scores were categorized as high if they were above the median of the population, and low if they were below the median. Animals with high avoidant but low active coping scores were grouped as animals with an avoidant coping style; animals with low avoidant but high active coping scores were grouped as having an active avoidant coping style; and animals with both high avoidant and high active coping scores were grouped as animals with mixed coping styles. Animals with both low avoidant and low active coping scores were classified as being low copers/non-reactive.

本研究中所有动物在人类入侵者测试及模型蛇测试中的行为评分数据。动物的行为评分基于测试后的视频记录进行评定。 vocalizations 被以声谱图的形式可视化以进行评分。 Excel 文件包含三个工作表。第一个工作表,'Figure 1' 包含构建文章图1所需的所有数据。其中列出了在人类入侵者测试中评分的动物的性别和行为评分,以及由探索性因子分析(EFA)得出的焦虑样行为因素评分。 第二个工作表,'Figure 2' 包含构建文章图2所需的所有数据。其中列出了在模型蛇测试中评分的动物的性别、行为评分以及相应的由EFA得出的应对因素评分。 最终的工作表,'Figure 3' 包含文章图3的数据。其中列出了在人类入侵者测试和模型蛇测试中接受测试的动物由EFA得出的因素评分。每个动物的处理风格组是基于模型蛇测试中中位数的主动和回避应对因素评分来确定的。评分被归类为高,如果它们高于人群的中位数,如果低于中位数则归类为低。具有高回避但低主动应对评分的动物被分组为具有回避应对风格的动物;具有低回避但高主动应对评分的动物被分组为具有主动回避应对风格的动物;同时具有高回避和高主动应对评分的动物被分组为具有混合应对风格的动物。同时具有低回避和低主动应对评分的动物被归类为低应对者/非反应者。
提供机构:
Apollo
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务