DiLisi_phylogenetic-features-july2017

The full data matrix with descriptions of the 172 characters as well as their values for all 23 dialects used in the phylogenetic analysis in Section 5.1. of the article 'Armenian prosody in typology and diachrony'. This paper examines the relationship between typology and historical linguistics through a case study from the history of Armenian, where two different stress systems are found in the modern language. The first is a penult system with no associated secondary stress ([... σ́σ]ω). The other, the so-called hammock pattern, has primary stress on the final syllable and secondary stress on the initial syllable of the prosodic word ([σ̀ ... σ́]ω). Although penult stress patterns are by far more typologically common than the hammock pattern in the world’s languages, I will argue that the hammock pattern must be reconstructed for the period of shared innovation, the Proto-Armenian period.

本文第五部分1.1节所涉及的172个字符的完整数据矩阵，包括其描述及其在23种方言中的值，用于对《类型学及历时性中的亚美尼亚韵律》一文中亚美尼亚韵律的谱系分析。该论文通过亚美尼亚历史中的案例研究，探讨了类型学与历史语言学之间的关系，其中在现代亚美尼亚语中发现两种不同的重音系统。首先是末尾音节重音系统，无关联的次级重音（[... σ́σ]ω）。另一种，所谓吊床模式，其在韵律词的最后一个音节上具有主要重音，在韵律词的第一个音节上具有次级重音（[σ̀ ... σ́]ω）。尽管在世界语言中，末尾音节重音模式比吊床模式更为常见，但我将论证，吊床模式必须重建于共享创新时期，即原始亚美尼亚语时期。