Smart City Governance, Innovations, Stakeholders' Satisfaction, and Crime Rate

Impact of Smart City Governance on Stakeholders' Satisfaction and Crime Rate: Moderating Impact of Institutional and Technological Innovation

Hypothesis 1: Higher the city governance is smart, higher the likelihood that stakeholders’ satisfaction will be enhanced.
Hypothesis 2: Higher the city governance is smart, higher the likelihood that crime rate in the city will be reduced.
Hypothesis 3: Better the institutional innovation in smart city, higher the likelihood that stakeholders are happy and satisfied
Hypothesis 4: Smart cities with better institutional innovation are likely to have lower crime rate
Hypothesis 5: Institutional innovation moderates and strengthens the relationship between smart city governance and stakeholders’ satisfaction
Hypothesis 6: Institutional innovation moderates and weakens the relationship between smart city governance and crime rates
Hypothesis 7: Better the technological innovation in smart city, higher the likelihood that stakeholders are happy and satisfied
Hypothesis 8: Smart cities with better technological innovation are likely to have lower crime rate
Hypothesis 9: Technological innovation moderates and strengthens the relationship between smart city governance and stakeholders’ satisfaction
Hypothesis 10: Technological innovation moderates and weakens the relationship between smart city governance and crime rates