S1 Fig -
收藏资源简介：
Page 1 (Data for Fig 2): Percentages of testa rupture versus the different kinds of treatment: deonized water (H2Od), plasma activated deonized water (PAW H2Od), tap water, plasma-activated tap water (PAWtap), helium flow (He), Plasma Helium, ambiant air and Plasma air. Page 2 (Data for Fig 3): A. Percentages of testa rupture for control (C) and plasma (P) versus different days after treatment: 0 day (t0), 2days (t2), 7 days (t7) and 9 days (t9) and 24h after imbibition. B. Percentages of testa rupture for control (C) and plasma (P) versus different days after treatment: 0 day (t0), 2days (t2), 7 days (t7) and 9 days (t9) and 40h after imbibition. C. Percentages of endosperm rupture for control (C) and plasma (P) versus different days after treatment: 0 day (t0), 2days (t2), 7 days (t7) and 9 days (t9) and 40h after imbibition. Page 3 (Data for Fig 5): Absorbance for water, control and plasma treatment: 5 successive tests and their average. Page 4 (Data for Fig 7): C. Diameter of the rosette versus age using tap water and plasma-activated tap water. D. Number of leaves versus age using tap water and plasma-activated tap water. E. Area of the leaves versus age using tap water and plasma-activated tap water. F. Total number of flowering plants versus age using tap water and plasma-activated tap water. (XLSX)
