Data and Code for: Intergenerational Mobility in American History: Accounting for Race and Measurement Error

A large body of evidence<b> </b>finds that relative mobility in the US has declined over the past 150 years. However, long-run mobility estimates are usually based on white samples and therefore do not account for the limited opportunities available for non-white families. Moreover, historical data measure the father’s status with error, which biases estimates toward greater mobility. Using linked census data from 1850-1940, I show that accounting for race and measurement error can double estimates of intergenerational persistence. Updated estimates imply that there is greater equality of opportunity today than in the past, mostly because opportunity was never that equal.<br><br>This archive holds the publicly available data and code accompanying the article. See "Related Publications" below for a link to the PSID data used in the paper.