Replication package of paper 'Taxonomy of Software Log Smells'

The replication package contains the following files and folders:<b>- Survey raw data.xlsx </b>containing the following tabs<i>Queries</i>: Lists the used queries (included and excluded) and the number of results<i>Extracted data</i>: List of all the results from the queries with a reason for excluding a paper from the survey or data extracted from that paper<i>Results from excluded queries</i>: The results from the queries not included in the study<i>Tools from SLR papers</i>: Links the tools listed in SLRs to the results from our survey or adds additional papers to the included papers<b>- Logging issue definition.xlsx </b>containing the following tabs<i>Final issues</i>: The final set of logging issues presented in the paper. Each issue is linked to the papers mentioning that issue. If a paper presents an example if the issue, the corresponding figure/table is recorded.<i>Issue extraction for Step 1: </i>The preliminary issue extraction from raw data conducted during Step 1. The issues are linked to the papers mentioning them.<b>Folder Step 1 - open card sort:</b><i>Step 1 - Open card sort (Author &lt;1-3&gt;).png: </i>Screenshots graphically showing the classification of issues each of the three authors made in the open card sort.<i>Step 1 - Open card sort results.xlsx </i>which contains the following tabs<i>:</i><i>Cards and descriptions</i>: List of the issues and their description.<i>Step 1 - Open card sort results</i>: Table issues and the category each of the authors sorted the issue (same data as in the screenshots but in textual form)<b>Folder Step 2 - closed card sort:</b>Closed card sort results.xlsx which contains the following tabs:<i>Cards and descriptions: </i>List of the issues and their descriptions. These issues were used as the cards in the card sort<i>Results by author: </i>List of the issues and how each of the authors categorized the issues.<i>Results grouped (percentage): </i>Table showing the percentage of answers categorizing an issues in a category. The issues are also sorted according to what most authors have categorized them into.<i>Group comparisons: </i>A table in which the columns indicate the four categories the issues were categorized into, while the rows indicate the number of authors classifying issues in the category.<br>