the effect of Pender’s model on nutrition behavior

Intervention 1: intervention group divided to 2 groups and took part in 2 training sessions with focus on perceived efficacy, perceived barriers and profits. After 3 months, they completed questionnaire again during this time we reminded them with SMS or electronic massages. Intervention 2: In control group wasn’t done any intervention at the same time (of interventions for intervention group). After completion the interventions data and information will be analyzed and pretest and post test results for both groups will be compared and if it be positive same intervention will be done for control group.;Prevention;Prevention;intervention group divided to 2 groups and took part in 2 training sessions with focus on perceived efficacy, perceived barriers and profits. After 3 months, they completed questionnaire again during this time we reminded them with SMS or electronic massages.;In control group wasn’t done any intervention at the same time (of interventions for intervention group). After completion the interventions data and information will be analyzed and pretest and post test results for both groups will be compared and if it be positive same intervention will be done for control group.
Primary outcome(s): Preventable nutrition behavior. Timepoint: before intervention and 3 months after intervention. Method of measurement: researcher-made questionnaire.
Study Design: Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Not blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Prevention.