Comparison of automatic detection performance for different algorithms.
收藏Figshare2024-03-22 更新2026-04-28 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Comparison_of_automatic_detection_performance_for_different_algorithms_/25461722
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
The table shows the number of correctly detected neurons (TP), undetected ones (FN), and false detections (FP), their rates, and the accuracy of the output of See Elegans and two other tracking algorithms: Trackmate and RoiEdit3D. The parameters of See Elegans and TrackMate include threshold and spot size settings, while ROIedit3D was set to the confocal parameter set. See Elegans detects more neurons and has fewer false negatives and positives, outperforming other algorithms.
创建时间:
2024-03-22



