five

Comparison of automatic detection performance for different algorithms.

收藏
Figshare2024-03-22 更新2026-04-28 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Comparison_of_automatic_detection_performance_for_different_algorithms_/25461722
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
The table shows the number of correctly detected neurons (TP), undetected ones (FN), and false detections (FP), their rates, and the accuracy of the output of See Elegans and two other tracking algorithms: Trackmate and RoiEdit3D. The parameters of See Elegans and TrackMate include threshold and spot size settings, while ROIedit3D was set to the confocal parameter set. See Elegans detects more neurons and has fewer false negatives and positives, outperforming other algorithms.
创建时间:
2024-03-22
5,000+
优质数据集
54 个
任务类型
进入经典数据集
二维码
社区交流群

面向社区/商业的数据集话题

二维码
科研交流群

面向高校/科研机构的开源数据集话题

数据驱动未来

携手共赢发展

商业合作