five

Acceptability of internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (i-CBT) for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD): a systematic review

收藏
DataCite Commons2021-09-29 更新2024-07-27 收录
下载链接:
https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Acceptability_of_internet-based_cognitive_behavioural_therapy_i-CBT_for_post-traumatic_stress_disorder_PTSD_a_systematic_review/11298677/1
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
<b>Background</b>: Internet-delivered Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (i-CBT) offers potential as an alternative, accessible, clinically and cost-effective treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but little is known about its acceptability. <b>Objective</b>: To review the available evidence to understand the acceptability of i-CBT for PTSD. <b>Method</b>: We undertook a mixed-methods systematic review according to Cochrane Collaboration Guidelines, of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of i-CBT for adults with PTSD. We examined included studies for measures of acceptability, and possible proxy indicators of acceptability, including dropout rates, which were meta-analysed as risk ratios (RRs). <b>Results</b>: Ten studies with 720 participants were included. We found i-CBT to be acceptable according to specific acceptability measures, and suggestions for acceptability according to some proxy measures of i-CBT programme usage. There was, however, evidence of greater dropout from i-CBT than waitlist (RR 1.39, CI 1.03–1.88; 8 studies; participants = 585) and no evidence of a difference in dropout between i-CBT and i-non-CBT (RR 2.14, CI 0.97–4.73; participants = 132; 2 studies). <b>Conclusion</b>: i-CBT appears a potentially acceptable intervention for adults with PTSD. We identified clinical and research questions, including the status of proxy indicators, and call for standardised, consistent treatment acceptability measurement. • A review of acceptability of internet-delivered CBT (i-CBT) for PTSD.• I-CBT is a potentially acceptable psychological treatment for PTSD.• Small number of studies limits generalisability of findings.• Standardised, consistent acceptability measurement is needed.
提供机构:
Taylor & Francis
创建时间:
2019-11-29
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务