File S1 - Chemical Cues Released by an Alien Invasive Aquatic Gastropod Drive Its Invasion Success

Table S1. Results of ANOVA testing for differences in snail (n = 145) displacement between experimental treatments at St Lucia Estuary. Table S2. Results of Tukey HSD testing for differences in snail (n = 145) displacement among experimental treatments at St Lucia Estuary. Table S3. Results of ANOVA testing for differences in Assiminea cf. capensis (n = 29) displacement between experimental treatments at Catalina Bay. Table S4. Results of Tukey HSD testing for differences in Assiminea cf. capensis (n = 29) displacement among experimental treatments at Catalina Bay. Table S5. Results of ANOVA testing for differences in Tarebia granifera (n = 29) displacement between experimental treatments at Catalina Bay. Table S6. Results of Tukey HSD testing for differences in Tarebia granifera (n = 29) displacement among experimental treatments at Catalina Bay. Table S7. Results of ANOVA testing for differences in Melanoides tuberculata (n = 29) displacement between experimental treatments at St Lucia Estuary Mouth. Table S8. Results of Tukey HSD testing for differences in Melanoides tuberculata (n = 29) displacement among experimental treatments at St Lucia Estuary Mouth. Table S9. Results of ANOVA testing for differences in Coriandria durbanensis (n = 29) displacement between experimental treatments at Lister’s Point. Table S10. Results of Tukey HSD testing for differences in Coriandria durbanensis (n = 29) displacement among experimental treatments at Lister’s Point. Table S11. Results of ANOVA testing for differences in Assiminea cf. capensis (n = 29) displacement between experimental treatments at Charter’s Creek. Table S12. Results of Tukey HSD testing for differences in Assiminea cf. capensis (n = 29) displacement among experimental treatments at Charter’s Creek. Table S13. Results of ANOVA testing for differences in average number of steps taken by snails (n = 145), between experimental treatments at St Lucia Estuary. Table S14. Results of Tukey HSD testing for differences in average number of steps taken by snails (n = 145), among experimental treatments at St Lucia Estuary. Table S15. Results of ANOVA testing for differences in average number of steps taken by Assiminea cf. capensis (n = 29), between experimental treatments at Catalina Bay. Table S16. Results of Tukey HSD testing for differences in average number of steps taken by Assiminea cf. capensis (n = 29), among experimental treatments at Catalina Bay. Table S17. Results of ANOVA testing for differences in average number of steps taken by Tarebia granifera (n = 29), between experimental treatments at Catalina Bay. Table S18. Results of Tukey HSD testing for differences in average number of steps taken by Tarebia granifera (n = 29), among experimental treatments at Catalina Bay. Table S19. Results of ANOVA testing for differences in average number of steps taken by Melanoides tuberculata (n = 29), between experimental treatments at St Lucia Estuary Mouth. Table S20. Results of Tukey HSD testing for differences in average number of steps taken by Melanoides tuberculata (n = 29), among experimental treatments at St Lucia Estuary Mouth. Table S21. Results of ANOVA testing for differences in average number of steps taken by Coriandria durbanensis (n = 29), between experimental treatments at Lister’s Point. Table S22. Results of Tukey HSD testing for differences in average number of steps taken by Coriandria durbanensis (n = 29), among experimental treatments at Lister’s Point. Table S23. Results of ANOVA testing for differences in average number of steps taken by Assiminea cf. capensis (n = 29), between experimental treatments at Charter’s Creek. Table S24. Results of Tukey HSD testing for differences in average number of steps taken by Assiminea cf. capensis (n = 29), among experimental treatments at Charter’s Creek. (DOC)