five

PLMS/h comparisons between automatic methods and manually scoring.

收藏
Figshare2015-12-02 更新2026-04-29 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_PLMS_h_comparisons_between_automatic_methods_and_manually_scoring_/1265955
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
The squared correlation coefficient (r2) between PLMS/h determined automatically versus manually is shown in the table for previously published detectors and our PLM calculator with and without the SNR+ option. PLM are classified according to AASM 2007 scoring criteriaa with adjustment to LM classification for our classifier as described in the text.*RLS symptoms as defined in the text.aIber C A-IS, Chesson A, Quan SF. The AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events: Rules, Terminology and Technical Specifications. Westchester, Ill: American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2007.bTauchmann NPT. Automatic Detection of Periodic Leg Movements. J Sleep Res 1996; 5(4): 273–5.cWetter TC, Dirlich G, Streit J, Trenkwalder C, Schuld A, Pollmacher T. An automatic method for scoring leg movements in polygraphic sleep recordings and its validity in comparison to visual scoring. Sleep 2004; 27(2): 324–8.dFerri R, Zucconi M, Manconi M, et al. Computer-assisted detection of nocturnal leg motor activity in patients with restless legs syndrome and periodic leg movements during sleep. Sleep 2005; 28(8): 998–1004.PLMS/h comparisons between automatic methods and manually scoring.
创建时间:
2015-12-02
5,000+
优质数据集
54 个
任务类型
进入经典数据集
二维码
社区交流群

面向社区/商业的数据集话题

二维码
科研交流群

面向高校/科研机构的开源数据集话题

数据驱动未来

携手共赢发展

商业合作