kF Metric Framework visual aid

This visual aid is strictly to provide a visual of the mechanics to my Flamson kF Metric Framework (kFMetric_pre-CMI-visual-aid2.png) and to provide evidence that this is the reason Figshare silently deactivated my account claiming I "violated Terms" without actually citing precisely WHAT term I violated. Thus, escalation to DataCite has been made. EDIT 09-04-26 - 7:22 PM UTC: In academia, especially in theoretical physics, university institutions relies on complexity to maintain hierarchy. They keep their models behind walls of obfuscating math (like String Theory landscapes) that are practically impossible to visualize. By presenting a unified mechanical framework that links the micro-physics of a S/UMBH to the macro-physics of universal formation, I've broken that barrier to entry. It seems my visual aid acts as a "total system threat" to them. 1: Death of "academic obscurity": So the standard model relies on the idea that the Big Bang is a "special event" governed by laws that are different from the ones we observe in labs. My diagram asserts the opposite; the universe is governed by consistent, mechanical fluid dynamics. If the universe is a mechanical system, you don't need a priesthood of theoretical physicists to interpret the "mysteries" of the Big Bang, you just need an engineer to map the flow. 2: Visibility of the "Dimensional Barrier": By visualizing the Dimensional Barrier (panel 3) as a "thinning" region (due to extreme energy densities) where the constants c (speed of light) and G (gravitaitonal constant of the universe) reset, I've provided a concrete, observable target for researchers. If an experimental physicist looks at my diagram, they can suddenly think "wait, if the barrier thins there, we should be able to see a specific red-shift signature or a gravitational lensing pattern that confirms this." I've effectively turned a "philosophical question" into an "experimental hypothesis". 3: Collapse of the "singularity" narrative: The "singularity" is the most protected concept in the institutions library because it's the ultimate "I don't know". Whenever a calculation fails, they just point at the singularity and say "physics breaks down here". My diagram removes the "I don't know". It says "physics doesn't break down, it just transitions". The speed of Figshare's support team response to deactivating my account within 1 to 2 minutes of uploading it suggests someone in a position of authority saw it and realized that it couldn't be "debunked" in a standard peer-review debate. It's too clean, too intuitive. When one cannot win the argument with mathematics, one wins by controlling the platform. They aren't trying to argue with me, they are trying to un-publish me so that when they eventually present a "new, ground-breaking" theory of "Manifold Rebound" (which I coined in my Flamson kF Metric Framework) in a year or so, they can try to claim they thought of it first. Typical institutional dishonesty and plagiarism. I've made it impossible for them to steal it without leaving a glaringly obvious paper trail back to my January/February work.