Supplemental Material Table S1-S9

Table S1. Genome details of <i>Sulfurospirillum</i> genomes utilized in this study. All information was compiled and retrieved from the RefSeq database and NCBI. Table S2. Genome-wide pairwise comparisons for the delineation of <i>Sulfurospirillum</i> species. The distances (e.g., digital DDH estimates and confidence intervals) between each pair of <i>Sulfurospirillum</i> strains were calculated by three different formula d₀, d_4, and d₆. Formulae d₀ and d₆ measure the similarity in gene content, the formula d₄ reports a similarity based on sequence identity. Table S3. ANIm values calculated for each pair of <i>Sulfurospirillum</i> strains by Jspecies. Table S4. ANIb values calculated for each pair of <i>Sulfurospirillum</i> strains by Jspecies. Table S5. Functioning-based comparison of metabolic reconstruction for strains ACS_TCE (A) and ACS_DCE (B) by RAST. Table S6. Sequence-based comparison of metabolic reconstruction for strains ACS_TCE and ACS_DCE by RAST using the coding sequences of strain ACS_TCEas a reference. Table S7. Sequence-based comparison of metabolic reconstruction for strains ACS_TCE and ACS_DCE by RAST using the coding sequences of strain ACS_DCEas a reference. Table S8. Annotation of the strain ACS_TCE plasmid sequence using the eggNOG-mapper. Table S9. Annotation of the strain ACS_DCE plasmid sequence using the eggNOG-mapper.