16S and wgs comparison with simulated samples. Metagenomic
收藏NIAID Data Ecosystem2026-03-12 收录
下载链接：
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJEB42563
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务：
资源简介：
16S and wgs comparison with simulated samples
应用场景：
创建时间：
2021-04-23
相关数据集
Nanopore Direct from Sputum WGS comparison to Illumina
This samplesheet describes the ENA accessions for all isolates used in this study. It has optional columns with the barcode numbers, kits, and nanopore runs for the nanopore data.
DataCite Commons2022-09-23 更新130
Data from: A comparison between transcriptome sequencing and 16S metagenomics for detection of bacterial pathogens in wildlife
Background: Rodents are major reservoirs of pathogens responsible for numerous zoonotic diseases in humans and livestock. Assessing their microbial diversity at both the individual and population leve
DataONE2015-08-19 更新80
Forward reads (after demultiplexing)
This is the output after demultiplexing (qiime script: split_libraries_fastq.py ). Parameter used: --barcode_type hamming_8 --max_barcode_errors 0
Figshare2017-10-04 更新60
Human gut bacteria Targeted Locus (Loci)
A mock community of 27 isolates from the human gut. The individual strains differ by as little as 1 nucleotide in 16S sequence. The frequencies of these strains are spread across six orders of magnitu
NIAID Data Ecosystem80
Bench marking the assembly of viromes using Illumina, PacBio and Nanopore reads
Illumina PacBio ONT Flye Unicycler wtdbg2 (Redbean) Sequencing of a mock community of bacteriophages with three different sequencing technologies , in triplicate. Reads were assembled with multiple di
Mendeley Data2024-06-27 更新70
