five

Telerehabilitation program for COVID-19 survivors (TERECO) - Randomized controlled trial

收藏
NIAID Data Ecosystem2026-03-12 收录
下载链接:
http://datadryad.org/dataset/doi%253A10.5061%252Fdryad.59zw3r27n
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
Objectives To investigate superiority of a telerehabilitation program for Covid-19 (TERECO) over no rehabilitation with regard to exercise capacity, lower-limb muscle strength (LMS), pulmonary function, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and dyspnoea. Design Parallel-group randomised controlled-trial with 1:1 block-randomisation. Setting Three major hospitals from Jiangsu and Hubei provinces, China. Participants 120 formerly hospitalised Covid-19 survivors with remaining dyspnoea complaints were randomised with 61 allocated to control and 59 to TERECO. Intervention Unsupervised home-based 6-week exercise program comprising breathing control and thoracic expansion, aerobic exercise, and LMS exercise, delivered via smartphone, and remotely monitored with heart rate telemetry. Outcomes Primary outcome was 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) in metres. Secondary outcomes were squat time in seconds; pulmonary function assessed by spirometry; HRQOL measured with SF-12; and mMRC-dyspnoea. Outcomes were assessed at 6 weeks (post-treatment) and 28 weeks (follow-up). Results Adjusted between-group difference in change in 6MWD was 65.45 metres (95% CI 43.8, 87.1; p<0.001) at post-treatment and 68.62 metres (95% CI 46.39, 90.85; p<0.001) at follow-up. Treatment effects for LMS were 20.12 seconds (95% CI 12.34, 27.9; p<0.001) post-treatment and 22.23 seconds (95% CI 14.24, 30.21; p<0.001) at follow-up. No group differences were found for lung function except post-treatment MVV. Increase in SF-12 physical component was greater in the TERECO group with treatment effects estimated as 3.79 (95% CI 1.24, 6.35; p=0.004) at post-treatment and 2.69 (95% CI 0.06, 5.32; p=0.045) at follow-up. Conclusions This trial demonstrated superiority of TERECO over no rehabilitation for 6MWD, LMS, and physical HRQOL. Trial registration: ChiCTR2000031834, URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=52216 Methods Data are from a multi-centre, parallel-group randomised controlled trial. The original protocol for this study is available from (URL: http://idmr.scu.edu.cn/info.htm?id=1841614474692833). This study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on 11 Apr 2020 (ChiCTR2000031834). Ethical approval was first received from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University/Jiangsu Province Hospital (2020-SR-171, 9 April 2020) and then subsequently from the IRBs of Hubei Province Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine (2020016, 14 April 2020), and Huangshi Hospital of Chinese Medicine (HSZYPJ-2020-026-01, 20 April 2020). Three centres from Jiangsu (The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University), Hubei Wuhan (Hubei Province Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine), and Hubei Huangshi (Hubei Huangshi Hospital of Chinese Medicine) collected data from 119 patients recovering from COVID-19 after discharge from one of the centres (60 assigned to control and 59 assigned to intervention). Data were collected between 26 April and 9 December 2020 at three time points: baseline, post-treatment assessment at 6 weeks and follow-up assessment at 28 weeks. Assessed outcomes included 6 minute walking distance, squat time in seconds, pulmonary function parameters (FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, PEF, MVV), SF-12 medical outcomes short form, mMRC dyspnea (favorable outcome: being dyspnea-free). Adverse events were also recorded.
创建时间:
2021-07-11
5,000+
优质数据集
54 个
任务类型
进入经典数据集
二维码
社区交流群

面向社区/商业的数据集话题

二维码
科研交流群

面向高校/科研机构的开源数据集话题

数据驱动未来

携手共赢发展

商业合作