Anthropology and Einstein

Abstract May be it is surprisingly, but anthropologists ( V. Bogoraz-Tan (1923),L.Levi-Bruhl (1938-1939), B. Latour (1988) [1-3 ]) have been troubled by an apparent radicalism of Einstein’s Relativity . In particular, Lucien Levi-Bruhl in1938 had found that Einstein’s attempt to suggest that merely only physics is the science in which we do not know “primitive” impossibilités et ses absurdités and wealways do know rationally what we are talking about is not correct .In his remark on Einstein’s article in « Zeitschrifl für freie deutsche Forschung » ( 1938 ) Levi-Bruhl supposed also that Einstein’s Relativity itself cannot be free from such sort of ses absurdités as well. In 2012 I made attempt to formulate some anthropological doubts in mathematical language ( it is usual practice of the field anthropologists ) and published my remark on arithmetical counter- example for Einstein’s Relativity at Foundational Questions Institute website. It is remarkable, but my arguments were not rejected completely and some theorists had found sufficient foundation for my “nonsense” in Einstein’s Relativity, indeed