Digital Rubric Development for Assessing Procedural Texts in Technology-Enhanced Education

Rubric Instrument (from the paper's Table III) – The consolidated scoring rubric: 5 weighted categories (Clarity and Conciseness 25%, Completeness and Consistency 20%, Accessibility and Appropriateness 15%, Language and Structure 20%, Visual and Interactive Elements 20%), each with its two highest-weighted indicators (10 indicators total) and 5-point behaviorally anchored descriptors (1 = Bad to 5 = Very Good). Also includes the total-score formula and four provisional score-band interpretations (e.g., 85–100 = Excellent). Construct Claim Mapping (from Table I) – Maps each of the 5 rubric categories to one of 4 underlying construct claims (Comprehensibility, Executability, Audience fit, Digital usability), with a validity-basis definition and cited references for each. Comparison vs Prior Rubrics (from Table II) – A feature-comparison matrix showing how the proposed rubric's dimensional coverage (6 dimensions, e.g., step completeness, hyperlink/navigation checks) compares against three prior rubrics from the literature, using Yes/Partial/No ratings.