Table 2 in Removal of historical taxonomic bias and its impact on biogeographic analyses: a case study of Neotropical tardigrade fauna

Table 2. Extrapolated richness of limnoterrestrial and freshwater tardigrade species and standard error for each region and transition zone. Estimations were made with all data (‘false cosmopolitan’ and ‘indigenous species’) and only ‘indigenous data for comparison. Estimations were made using the Jackknife1 estimator (based on: Burnham and Overton 1978, 1979).
AreaDatasetNumber of provinces with at least one recordTotal number of provincesObserved richnessEstimated richnessStandard errorNeotropical regionAll data (‘false cosmopolitan’ and ‘indigenous species’)3350186282.96929.094‘Indigenous data’295096157.79319.499Andean regionAll data (‘false cosmopolitan’ and ‘indigenous species’)79105159.85731.489‘Indigenous data’794368.71414.154South America transition zoneAll data (‘false cosmopolitan’ and ‘indigenous species’)6766102.66625.011‘Indigenous data’372641.33012.995Mexican transition zoneAll data (‘false cosmopolitan’ and ‘indigenous species’)554165.80014.881‘Indigenous data’451119.2505.068