Supplementary material 1 from: Hagen BL, Kumschick S (2018) The relevance of using various scoring schemes revealed by an impact assessment of feral mammals. NeoBiota 38: 37-75. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.38.23509
收藏NIAID Data Ecosystem2026-03-11 收录
下载链接：
https://zenodo.org/records/1252072
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务：
资源简介：
Differences between scoring schemes (Table S1)
: Explanation note: Scoring differences for GISS, EICAT and SEICAT. This table was adapted from Kumschick et al. (2016) and Bacher et al. (2017). The numbers in the top column refer to the GISS scoring classifications, whereas the terms 'massive' to 'minimal concern' refer to EICAT and SEICAT scoring classifications.
创建时间：
2020-01-24
