Hollow-core NANF for High-speed Short-reach Transmission in the S+C+L-bands

This dataset supports the publication: Yang Hong, Thomas D. Bradley, Natsupa Taengnoi, Kyle R. H. Bottrill, John R. Hayes, Gregory T. Jasion, Francesco Poletti, Periklis Petropoulos, and David J. Richardson (2021), 'Hollow-core NANF for High-speed Short-reach Transmission in the S+C+L-bands', IEEE/OSA Journal of Lightwave Technology, doi: 10.1109/JLT.2021.3097278 This dataset contains data supporting the following figures: Fig. 1. Numerical comparisons amongst the SSMF, NZ-DSF and NANF at a length of 5 km: (a) CD, (b) 3-dB bandwidth, (c) profiles of CD-induced power fading after 5-km 1550-nm transmission and (d) fibre latency at 1550 nm. Fig. 4. Comparisons of BER and SNR performance versus ROP of 1550-nm Nyquist PAM4 transmission in SSMF, B2B and NANF links at (a)-(b): 80 Gb/s, (c)-(d): 100 Gb/s, and (e)-(f): 112 Gb/s. Fig. 5. ROP in different links and the measured loss of the SSMF-connectorized NANF over S+C+L-bands. Fig. 6. Comparisons of BER and SNR performance across the S+C+L-bands of Nyquist PAM4 transmission in SSMF, B2B and NANF links at (a)-(b): 80 Gb/s, (c)-(d): 100 Gb/s, and (e)-(f): 112 Gb/s. Fig. 7. BER and average SNR versus number of data subcarriers for uniformly-loaded DDO-OFDM transmission in ~5-km SSMF and NANF. Fig. 8. SNR profiles of uniformly-loaded DDO-OFDM after ~5-km transmission in (a) NANF and (b) SSMF. Fig. 9. BER and average SNR versus ROP for 65.625-Gb/s uniformly-loaded 4QAM-DDO-OFDM transmission in ~5-km SSMF and NANF. Fig. 10. BER versus number of data subcarriers for adaptively-loaded DDO-OFDM transmission in ~5-km SSMF and NANF. Fig. 11. SNR profiles of adaptively-loaded DDO-OFDM after ~5-km transmission in (a) NANF and (b) SSMF. Fig. 12. Comparison of the maximum achievable capacity versus ROP in SSMF and NANF, and the corresponding BER.