five

Resolving Internal Conflicts – (Mechanism and Contextual Influences)

收藏
PsychArchives2025-03-11 更新2026-04-25 收录
下载链接:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/11586
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
Am 7. August 2024 sprach Prof. Dr. Tali Kleiman vom Department of Psychology der Hebrew University of Jerusalem im ZPID-Kolloquium. In this talk I will revisit two seminal psychological theories through the lens of the mechanistic properties of, and contextual influence on internal conflict resolution. I will first discuss Kurt Lewin’s Motivational Conflicts theory which distinguishes between approach-approach (AP-AP) and avoidance-avoidance (AV-AV) conflicts. I will present classic behavioral, mouse-tracking, and EEG evidence pertaining to three core questions: First, Why AP-AP and AV-AV conflicts differ (testing a force-fields mechanism)? Second, when do they differ (looking at contextual boundary conditions)? And third, whether they indeed differ (are they construed as different tasks)? I will then look into Bem’s Self Perception theory, which broadly posits that individuals learn about their preferences through observing their own behavior. Using a novel application of the mouse-tracking paradigm, I will show how tracking their own conflict resolution (choice) process affects individuals’ conflict markers and meta-cognitive inferences. I will conclude with implications for other fields of psychological research, and advocate for the importance of revisiting classic psychological theories using theoretical and empirical knowledge that we have accumulated through the years. On August 7, 2024 Prof. Dr. Tali Kleiman from the Department of Psychology at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem spoke at the ZPID Colloquium. unknown
提供机构:
ZPID (Leibniz Institute for Psychology)
创建时间:
2025-03-11
5,000+
优质数据集
54 个
任务类型
进入经典数据集
二维码
社区交流群

面向社区/商业的数据集话题

二维码
科研交流群

面向高校/科研机构的开源数据集话题

数据驱动未来

携手共赢发展

商业合作