Replication data for: Fig 8.14, top, Closest vs farther for alarm callers, UPDs, 21 Nov 2025
收藏DataCite Commons2025-11-24 更新2026-04-25 收录
下载链接:
https://data.indores.fr:443/citation?persistentId=doi:10.48579/PRO/IEAOTQ
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
FILE DESCRIPTION Keywords: alarm calls, closest vs farther away, UPDs Filename: Fig 8.14, top, Closest vs farther for alarm callers, UPDs, 21 Nov 2025 OLD Filename: UPDs, Alarm calls, closest vs farther from badger, 10 April 2019 436/1876 of closest UPDs = 23.24% DID give alarm call 1440/1876 of closest UPDs = 76.76% DID NOT give alarm call 763/2575 farther UPDs = 29.63% DID give alarm call 1812/2575 of farther UPDs = 70.37% DID NOT give alarm call The summaries I provide immediately above and in Fig 8.14 for my new book are from the SUMMATION OF DATA FROM ALL YEARS Variable = Frequency = number of observations of calling or non-calling for closest and not closest prairie dogs Close prairie dog = 1 = closest to prairie dog Close prairie dog = 2 = NOT closest to prairie dog UPD alarm call = 1 = prairie dog DID give alarm call UPD alarm call = 2 = prairie dog did NOT give alarm call For statistical analysis, I did a 2x2 chi-square test These data used for Fig 8.14, Top, in Hoogland 2026. This file ready for longterm storage on 03 June 2025. I considered data from the same prairie dog in different years to be independent. Counts for this file come from study of alarm call raw data sheets. Filename: Fig 8.14, Top, Closest vs farther for alarm callers, UPDs, 21 Nov 2025 I considered data from the same prairie dog on the same day and on different days and in different years to be independent. I assume that I checked these data TWO TIMES, but I cannot find that assurance.
提供机构:
data.InDoRES
创建时间:
2025-11-21



