Effect of the intervention on program outputs, behavioral outcomes, and water quality, 2011.

aThe number of observations used to estimate means of the intervention and the control groups is the same as the number of observations used in ITT-unadjusted analysis.bExplanatory variables in the unadjusted model include the treatment assignment and indicator variables for Blocks. Therefore, the ITT effects for outcomes may not be exactly the difference between the listed mean in intervention and control groups in previous columns.cBecause of missing adjustment variables data, the observations used in adjusted analysis are fewer than those used in unadjusted analysis. The number of observations used is seven to 113 less than that in unadjusted analysis.dFollowing the commonplace norms, statistical significance is indicated as:***significant at α = 0.01;**significant at α = 0.05;*significant at α = 0.10.Please note that p-values are not adjusted for multiple comparisons following guidance from Schulz and Grimes [43].CFU, colony forming units; HH, household; OD, open defecation; TSC/NGP, Total Sanitation Campaign/Nirmal Gram Puraskar; WASH, water, sanitation and hygiene.Effect of the intervention on program outputs, behavioral outcomes, and water quality, 2011.