Meta-analyses of studies examining the effect of psychological treatment for depression (Additional and sensitivity analyses).
收藏NIAID Data Ecosystem2026-03-09 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Does_Publication_Bias_Inflate_the_Apparent_Efficacy_of_Psychological_Treatment_for_Major_Depressive_Disorder_A_Systematic_Review_and_Meta_Analysis_of_US_National_Institutes_of_Health_Funded_Trials_/1560401
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
* p < .05; ** p < .01; Italic numbers indicate a non-significant trend (p < .10). a difference between the effect size point estimates of the published studies only and the published + unpublished studies, calculated using 5 decimals. b 1 degree of freedom. c Sensitivity analysis changing psychotherapy ranks in the published study, which was intended to minimize allegiance effects [47]. d Sensitivity analysis counting [39] that does not report effect size data as unpublished. e Sensitivity analysis including the unpublished Gottlieb study, for which the effect size was estimated to be zero because of missing data. Note: NSt = number of studies; PT = psychological treatment; Qbetw. = Q between value.
(DOCX)
创建时间:
2015-09-30



