five

Total Score HUC 12 SageBrush Core and Growth and BRAT

收藏
US Fish and Wildlife Service Open Data2026-03-28 收录
下载链接:
https://gis-fws.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/fws::total-score-huc-12-sagebrush-core-and-growth-and-brat
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
<div style='text-align:Left; font-size:12pt;'><p><span>This layer creates a total mesic restoration potential score.  Total score of 1 is lowest priority and 10 is highest priority. The score is composed of 2 sub scores described below.</span></p><p></p><p><span style='font-size:12.0pt; font-family:&quot;inherit&quot;,serif; color:#242424; border:none windowtext 1.0pt; padding:0in; background:white;'></span></p><p><span style='font-size:12pt; font-family:&quot;inherit&quot;, serif; color:rgb(36, 36, 36); border:1pt none windowtext; padding:0in; background-image:initial; background-position:initial; background-size:initial; background-repeat:initial; background-attachment:initial; background-origin:initial; background-clip:initial;'>For both Planning and Site Level work, this layer includes polygons showcasing the percentage of each Idaho HUC (8 or 12) in Sagebrush Core and Growth categories based on the Sagebrush Conservation Design.  These HUCs are divided into 5 equal intervals 0-20%, 20-40%, 40-60%, 60-80%, and 80-100% and symbolized, with dark colors showing more sagebrush core and growth.  In addition, they are scored 1-5 with 1 signifying HUCs averaging the least amount of Sagebrush per HUC and 5 being areas averaging the most Sagebrush per HUC. </span></p><p><span style='font-size:12.0pt; font-family:&quot;inherit&quot;,serif; color:#242424; border:none windowtext 1.0pt; padding:0in; background:white;'>The Beaver Restoration Assessment Tool (BRAT) downloads for the state of Idaho were incorporated into the analysis.<span>  </span>The results for perennial streams were queried to include only the streams categorized in the BRAT analysis as Easiest- low hanging fruit, or Straightforward with the purpose of selecting streams where it might be easiest to provide process-based restoration.<span>  </span><span> </span>After the BRAT data was filtered on these categories it was clipped to find only the streams that were falling within Sagebrush Core and Growth areas or a 500ft buffer of Core and Growth Areas.<span>  </span>The resulting BRAT streams that fit these two criteria – in Easiest or Straightforward areas and within a 500ft boundary of Sagebrush Core and Growth areas were summed based on stream miles per HUC.<span>  </span>They were binned into 5 categories using Quantile and scored 1-5 with the HUCs having the most stream miles for potential restoration receiving a 5, and those with the least stream miles receiving a 1. <span>  </span>These steps were taking for both HUC 8 and HUC12. </span></p><span></span><p></p></div>
提供机构:
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
5,000+
优质数据集
54 个
任务类型
进入经典数据集
二维码
社区交流群

面向社区/商业的数据集话题

二维码
科研交流群

面向高校/科研机构的开源数据集话题

数据驱动未来

携手共赢发展

商业合作