Data from: Collateral damage or a shadow of safety? The effects of signaling heterospecific neighbors on the risks of parasitism and predation

Although males often display from mixed-species aggregations, the
influence of nearby heterospecifics on risks associated with sexual
signaling has not been previously examined. We tested whether predation
and parasitism risks depend on proximity to heterospecific signalers.
Using field playback experiments with calls of two species that often
display from the same ponds, túngara frogs and hourglass treefrogs, we
tested two hypotheses: (1) Calling near heterospecific signalers
attractive to eavesdroppers results in increased attention from predatory
bats and parasitic midges (Collateral Damage hypothesis); or (2) Calling
near heterospecific signalers reduces an individual’s predation and
parasitism risks, as eavesdroppers are drawn to the heterospecifics
(Shadow of Safety hypothesis). Bat visitation was not affected by calling
neighbors. The number of frog-biting midges attracted to hourglass
treefrog calls, however, rose threefold when played near túngara calls,
supporting the collateral damage hypothesis. We thus show that proximity
to heterospecific signalers can drastically alter both the absolute risks
of signaling and the relative strengths of pressures from predation and
parasitism. Through these mechanisms, interactions between heterospecific
guild members are likely to influence the evolution of signaling
strategies and the distribution of species at both local and larger
scales.