A discrete choice experiment to validate the use of areal wombling for detecting social boundaries
收藏DataCite Commons2024-10-11 更新2024-07-13 收录
下载链接:
https://orda.shef.ac.uk/articles/dataset/A_discrete_choice_experiment_to_validate_the_use_of_areal_wombling_for_detecting_social_boundaries/25731387/1
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
Data, code and materials from a discrete experiment to test the validity of an Bayesian areal wombling algorithm for predicting social boundaries. The experiment was conducted as a part of project ‘Life at the Frontier: Researching the Impact of Social Frontiers on the Social Mobility and Integration of Migrants’ (2020-2023; NordForsk/ESRC, project no 95193), and experiment data was collected in Rotherham (UK).<b>About the experiment</b>Each border on a map is assigned a boundary value based on how dissimilar the adjacent neighbourhoods are (higher = more dissimilar = more likely to be a social boundary).The experiment was carried out as follows:- We created three maps of the same area with different boundaries using the Bayesian areal wombling approach.- Map A contained the boundaries with the highest boundary values, whilst map C had the lowest boundary values. Map B contained boundaries that were in between.- During an interview, participants were then shown pairs of maps and asked which map in each pair best corresponds to local community boundaries.- The sequence and order of the maps shown were randomised.- Assuming that residents and experts can recognise (but not necessarily recall) social boundaries, we conjecture that participants would choose the map containing borders with higher boundary values.Hypothesis: We hypothesise that participants will agree with the predictions of the areal wombling algorithm and choose boundaries with higher boundary values.Null hypothesis: Participants are not more or less likely to choose boundaries with higher boundary values.Aside from testing a hypothesis, another motivation behind the study is to explore the feasibility of the method for future replications and follow-up research.<b>More information</b>This study was approved by the University of Sheffield ethics committee (application number 042378).Please read the README file for a more detailed description of the content of this repository.
提供机构:
The University of Sheffield
创建时间:
2024-05-16



