Table 4 in A new micro-endemic species of Cyrtodactylus Gray, 1827 (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from the lowlands of Northeast India, with additional morphological notes on Cyrtodactylus khasiensis Jerdon, 1870 based on topotypical specimens from Meghalaya, India

Table 4 (continued). Comparisons of main morphological characters amongst species that are described within the ‘Indo-Burmese khasiensis clade’ to date. Abbreviations NA = Not Available; * = Discrepancies in scale-counting methods between cited sources and current criteria.
SpeciesSVL (mm)SLILPcFP/PcP (male)PcFP/ PcP (female)DTRPVT1PVT2MVSREnlarged plate-like subcaudalsDark dorsal blotches (from nape to mid-sacrum)ReferenceC. guwahatiensis61.9–70.58–118–1026–39021–24NA35–3830–35no8–10 (paired, not completely transverse)Agarwal et al. 2018b; Purkayastha et al. 2020C. jaintiaensis87.0–96.28–99–1011–1212 pores19–20NA30–3440–42noIrregular and distinct, but pairedAgarwal et al. 2018bC. karanshahi53.2–74.510–1210–117–8NA18–19NA32–3639–42noIrregular, small blotchesBhattarai et al. 2025C. karsticola63.7–70.710–119–1034–380 (13 pitted scales)21–24NA34–3935–39noIrregular and distinct, but pairedPurkayastha et al. 2021C. kazirangaensis74.8–80.011–129–1110–11NA22–23NA36–3837–43no6–8, irregular and distinctAgarwal et al. 2018bC. khasiensis57.0–81.19–138–1110–12019–2342–53NA34–42no8–10 (paired and distinct)Agarwal et al. 2018aC. kiphire63.9–64.7109–126–7NA16NA26–2935–36noIrregular blotches or reticulationsBoruah et al. 2024C. lungleiensis64.9–75.110–119–113–50 (5–7 pitted scales)24–28NA32–4037–43noIrregular blotches or reticulationsLalremsanga et al. 2022C. manipurensis59.5108–97NA21NA3736no6 irregular blotches or Boruah et al. 2024 reticulationsC. mandalayensis61.710/ 129/108NA18NANA32noIrregularMahony 2009C. martinstolii64.6–80.410–1210–127–80 (8–9 pitted scales)19–23NA30–3735–40noIrregular but distinct dark blotchesBhattarai et al. 2025C. montanus53.6–78.28–108–108–10021–23NA37–4336–42noCompletely irregular dark blotchesAgarwal et al. 2018bC. mombergi64–74**10–110–9 pores23–27NA35–4231–39noCompletely irregular dark blotchesGrismer et al. 2019C. myaleiktaung67.4**NA0NANANA57NA7 (distinct and transversely wide)Grismer et al. 2018C. namtiram65.88–91012NA21NA3336no6–7, irregular but distinctly paired blotchesMahony & Kamei 2022C. nagalandensis67.5–72.010–12 8–10NA0 (6 pitted scales)16–18NA35–3734–35noCompletely irregular dark blotchesAgarwal et al. 2018bC. ngopensis62.6–68.610–119–1160 (0–6 pitted scales)19–20NA32–3632–39no7–10 irregular dark blotchesBohra et al. 2022C. ngengpuiensis53.9–74.19–128–112710–16 pores18–20NA29–3438–39noCompletely irregular dark blotchesBoruah et al. 2024C. namdaphaensis54.8–70.78–118–117–98–10 pores17–19NA29–3633–40noCompletely irregular dark blotchesBoruah et al. 2024C. septentrionalis58–65.29–109140 (14 indistinct pits)23–24NA38–4235–38no6–9 rows of paired dark blotchesAgarwal et al. 2018bC. siangensis70.1–72.18–129–12NA8 or 10 pores15–16NA26–3240–45nosix or seven irregular and broken dark-brown bandsBoruah et al. 2024C. siahaensis42.6–729–119–1170 (0–3 pitted scales)22–24NA36–3934–37nodark brown, irregular blotchesPurkayastha et al. 2022C. urbanus65.4–75.68–118–109–13020–24NA30–4030–39nodark brown, irregular blotchesPurkayastha et al. 2020; Kamei & Mahony 2021C. vairengtensis57.6–73.610–1110–119–110 (0–9 pitted scales)22–23NA34–3935–41nodark brown, irregular blotchesLalremsanga et al. 2023C. tamaiensis9010940NA21NANA37nodark brown, irregular blotchesMahony 2009C. vanarakshaka53.1–659–119–10100 (10 pitted scales)21–2252–5535–3638–41nodark brown, irregular blotchesBharali et al. 2025C. tripuraenensis54.4–69.38–128–1029–37 (male)0 (20–29 pitted scales)19–2144–54NA35–43no7–10, paired and distinctAgarwal et al. 2018aC. jayadityai sp. nov.47.8– 54.9 (up to 70.7 including BNHS 2230)9–129–1118–28 (male)0 (0–19 pitted scales)19–2144–5030–3137–43no9–10, paired and distinctThis study (data of BNHS 2230 taken from Agarwal et al. 2018a)