Table 3 in Colletotrichum chinense sp. nov. from Yucca gloriosa and C. quercicola sp. nov. from Quercus variabilis in China

Table 3. Morphological comparison of species in the Colletotrichum destructivum species complex. SpeciesTypeMedia for Conidia morphHostsDistributionConidia (µm)Appressoria (µm)ReferenceC. americae-borealisHolotypeSNAMedicago sativa; Glycyrrhiza uralensisAmerica; China(13.5-)15.5-18(-19) × 3.5-4(4.5-)6-10.5(-13) × (3.5-)4-7(-10)Damm et al. (2014)C. antirrhinicolaHolotypeSNAAntirrhinum majusNew Zealand; Japan(14.5-)15.5-19(-23.5) × (3.5-) 4-4.5(-5)(9-)9.5-12(-13.5) × (5-)6-8(-10)Damm et al. (2014)C. atractylodicolaHolotypePDAAtractylodes lanceaChina13.5-19 × 4-6.57.5-14 × 7-10.5Xu et al. (2018)C. bryoniicolaHolotypeSNAgenera of Asteraceae, Convolvulaceae, and Fabaceae; etcNetherlands; Italy(13.5-)15-18.5(-22) × 4-5(-5.5)(3.5-) 4-10(-18) × (2.5-)3.5-6.5(-7.5)Damm et al. (2014)C. destructivumEpitypeSNATrifolium spp.; Bletilla ochracea; Phragmites sp.; etcworldwide(14-)14.5-16.5(-18) × 3.5-4(-4.5)(6.5-)10-15.5(-20.5) × (4.5-)5-8(-10.5Damm et al. (2014)C. fuscumEpitypeSNADigitalis spp.; Heracleum sp.; Coreopsis lanceolataGermany; Italy; Netherlands(16-)16.5-20(-34) × (3.5-)4-4.5(-5.5)(6-)8.5-14.5(-19) × (6.5-)7-10(-11.5)Damm et al. (2014)C. higginsianumEpitypeSNABrassicaceae; Campanula sp.; Rumex acetosaItaly; Japan, Korea; Trinidad; Tobago; America(17-)19-20.5(-21) × (3-)3.5-4(-4.5)(5.5-)10-20(-28.5) × (3.5-) 5-9(-12)Damm et al. (2014)C. lentisHolotypeSNALens culinaris; Vicia sativaCanada; China; Romania(13-)16-20(-26) × 3-4(-5)(5-)5.5-7.5(-9) × (3.5-)4.5-6(-6.5)Damm et al. (2014)C. liniEpitypeSNALinum sp.; Nigella sp.; Taraxacum sp.; etcFrance; Germany; America; Ireland; Tunisia;Netherlands(13-)15-18(-22.5) × (3-)3.5-4(-4.5)(5-)6.5-10(-12.5) × (4-)4.5-6(-7)Damm et al. (2014)C. neorubicolaHolotypePDARubus idaeusChina(14.8-)21.5-22.7(-23.5) × (4-)4.9-5.1(-5.6)(4-)8.2-10.5(-17.5) × (3.6-)5.6-6.8(-11.7)Liu et al. (2020)C. ocimiHolotypeSNAOcimum basilicumItaly; Australia14.5-15.5(-16.5) × (3.5-)4-4.5(6.5-)7-13(-15.5) × (4-)4.5-7.5(-9)Damm et al. (2014)C. quercicolaHolotypePDAQuercus variabilisChina(14-)14.5-17.5(-21.5) × (3-)3.3-4.3(-4.7)(5.7-)6.8-9.7(-10) × (3.2-)4-6(-8)This studyC. panacicolaPanax sp.Eastern Asia17.0-22.1 × 3.4-5.114-8Takimoto (1919)C. pleopeltidisHolotypeSNAPleopeltis sp.South Africa(15-)19-23(-25) × (5-)5.5(-6)Not describedCrous et al. (2021)C. pisicolaHolotypeSNAPisum sp.America(11-)15-21(-29.5) × (3-)3.5-4(5.5-)7-11.5(-13.5) × (4-)4.5-6(-6.5)Damm et al. (2014)C. shisoiHolotypePDAPerilla frutescensJapan(15.0-)17-19(-27.0) × (3.0-)4.0(-5.0)(7.0-)9.0-10.0(-11.0) × (5.0-)7.0-8.0Gan et al. (2019)C. tabacumNeotypeSNANicotiana spp., Centella asiaticaFrance; India; Germany; Madagascar; Zimbabwe(11·5-) 19-20 (-27) × (3-) 5·5-5·8 (-7·6)(10-) 11·5-12·5 (-14·5) × (6·5-) 8·5-9·5 (-11·5)Damm et al. (2014)C. tanacetiHolotypeSNATanacetum cinerariifoliumAustralia(13-)14.5-17.5(-19) × (3-)3.5-4(-4.5)(5-)6.5-12(-14.6) × (3.5-)4.5-7(-10)Damm et al. (2014)C. utrechtenseHolotypePDATrifolium pratenseNetherlands17.5-20.5(-23) × 3.5-4(-4.5)(7-)10-14.5(-15) × (5-)6.5-9.5(-10)Barimani et al. (2013)C. vignaeHolotypeSNAVigna unguiculataNigeria(12-)14-17.5(-18.5) × (3-)3.5-4(-4.5)(4-)4.5-8.5(-12.4) × (3.5-)4-5(-6.5)Damm et al. (2014)