"Table 2" of "Nuclear stopping in Au + Au collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV."

$\frac{\mathrm{d}N}{\mathrm{d}y}$ versus $y$ for $\mathrm{p}$,$\overline{\mathrm{p}}$,$\mathrm{p}-\overline{\mathrm{p}}$ in $\mathrm{Au}-\mathrm{Au}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=200\,\mathrm{Ge\!V}$ . The correction for the $\Lambda$ contribution is not straight forward since BRAHMS does not measure the $\Lambda$s and PHENIX and STAR only measures the $\Lambda$s at mid-rapidity! If one assumes that the mid-rapidity estimated in the paper of $$R=\frac{\Lambda-\bar{\Lambda}}{\mathrm{p}-\bar{\mathrm{p}}} = \frac{\Lambda}{\mathrm{p}} = \frac{\bar{\Lambda}}{\bar{\mathrm{p}}} = 0.93\pm 0.11(\mathrm{stat})\pm 0.25(\mathrm{syst}) $$ and the BRAHMS "acceptance factor" of $A=0.53\pm 0.05$ which includes both that only 64% decays to protons and that some are rejected by the requirement of the track to point back to the IP. The corrected $\mathrm{p}$ ($\bar{\mathrm{p}}$ or net-$\mathrm{p}$) is then : $$\left.\frac{\mathrm{d}N}{\mathrm{d}y}\right|_{\mathrm{corrected}} = \frac{\mathrm{d}N}{\mathrm{d}y}(1/(1+RA))= \frac{\mathrm{d}N}{\mathrm{d}y}\left(0.67\pm 0.05(\mathrm{stat})\pm 0.11(\mathrm{syst})\right)$$ Which can be used at all rapidities if one believes that R is constant. The fact that net-$\mathrm{K}=\mathrm{K}^{+}-\mathrm{K}^{-}$ follows net-$\mathrm{p}$ (see fx. talk by Djamel Ouerdane at QM04), seems to indicate that the net-$\Lambda$ follow the net-$\mathrm{p}$ trend and the correction is reasonable.