Additional file 2 of An integrated QTL and RNA-seq analysis revealed new petal morphology loci in Brassica napus L.

Additional file 2: Table S1. The statistical data of MPA, MPP, PAR, MPL, MPW, and PCD in the KN DH population under six microenvironments, including 17WH, 17YL, 18WH, 18YL, 19WH, and 19YL. Table S2. The Pearson correlation coefficient of MPA, MPP, PAR, MPL, MPW, and PCD in 17WH. The p-value was represented by “*” (p < 0.05, significant) and “**” (p < 0.01, highly significant). Table S3. The Pearson correlation coefficient of MPA, MPP, PAR, MPL, MPW, and PCD in 17YL. The p-value was represented by “*” (p < 0.05, significant) and “**” (p < 0.01, highly significant). Table S4. The Pearson correlation coefficient of MPA, MPP, PAR, MPL, MPW, and PCD in 18WH. The p-value was represented by “*” (p < 0.05, significant) and “**” (p < 0.01, highly significant). Table S5. The Pearson correlation coefficient of MPA, MPP, PAR, MPL, MPW, and PCD in 18YL. The p-value was represented by “*” (p < 0.05, significant) and “**” (p < 0.01, highly significant). Table S6. The Pearson correlation coefficient of MPA, MPP, PAR, MPL, MPW, and PCD in 19WH. The p-value was represented by “*” (p < 0.05, significant) and “**” (p < 0.01, highly significant). Table S7. The Pearson correlation coefficient of MPA, MPP, PAR, MPL, MPW, and PCD in 19YL. The p-value was represented by “*” (p < 0.05, significant) and “**” (p < 0.01, highly significant). Table S8. The detailed information of all identified QTLs detected in the present study. The “position”, “from”, and “to” were presented by the genetic distance. Table S9. The detailed information of all consensus QTLs detected in the present study, and the “position”, “from”, and “to” were presented by the genetic distance. Table S10. The detailed information of all unique QTLs detected in the present study, and the “position”, “from”, and “to” were presented by the genetic distance. Table S11. All PDRs collected in the present study. Table S12. The detailed information of each RNA-seq sample. Table S13. The primers used in the present study. Table S14. The detailed information of candidate genes and high-confidence candidate genes. Table S15. The sequence variations of candidate genes. Table S16. The expression profile (presented by FPKM) of 152 candidate PDRs expressed in the flower stage petals (B ~ J) and their log2(FC) between different petal samples (K ~ P). The zero values of FPKMs were replaced by 0.01 to avoid invalid parameters. Table S17. The expression profile (presented by FPKM) of 168 candidate PDRs expressed in the bud stage petals (B ~ J) and their log2(FC) between different petal samples (K ~ P). The zero values of FPKMs were replaced by 0.01 to avoid invalid parameters. Table S18. The previously reported petal size QTLs of B. napus that are consistent with the petal morphology QTLs detected in the present study.